Developmentjournalism demands that the media should allow open debate on development
enable circulation of diverse opinions and ideas, extend frontiers of freedom
to public, further connecting and bridging the gap between government and the
public and mobilising the public in support of development agendas. It assigns
the media the fourth estate role and echoes the philosophy of the public sphere
concept. The above demands are the responsibility of journalists and the media
in making sure they are met but however in a nutshell the media fails to
promote development journalism due to factors such as commercialisation,
ownership and control, gender stereotyping, competition, lack of funds and
envelope journalism.
.
Ownership
and control of the media is another factor disturbing the promotion of
development journalism. Those who own and control the media are the elite who
tend to use the media to push up their political and economic agendas instead
of buttressing development communication. Reporters for Government run media
such as the Chronicle and Star FM cannot provide checks and balances of the
government because no owner can monitor themselves. The private media tried to
question the Zimpapers group for rewarding its staff in helping ZANu pf win the
elections in July but the private media forgot to monitor itself that the
agenda behind this was political and not in the interests of the people. Zimpapers
group CEO, Mutasa even argued saying “After all, the so called independent
media is not so independent….they stand for foreign interest,” where most of
their funding and control originates.
The
commercial imperative of the media has also led to journalist killing the
reporting of development stories and settling for more marketable leads. Sreshthaputra
2010 calls this opportunity cost of stories ‘the nature of the beast’ where the
notion ‘where it bleeds it leads’ is still valid in most media houses.
Development journalism is a non-profit driven theory but with most media firms
in the industry to make money they find it difficult and irrelevant to run
stories that will not generate any income or be money friendly to them. As a
result this has led to journalist discarding development journalism or rather
skewing development journalism to fit the profit motive. Alpha media holdings
for instance is pioneered by the profit driver where only what is reported are
stories or advertisements that will increase their bank balance and make sure
their sales increase.
Millenniumdevelopment goal number three demands the promotion of gender equality and
women empowerment. The idea is that development journalism should be inclusive
of women with the gender and development approach arguing that women are agents
of change. Mommsen 2004 further argues that development
journalism should be inclusive of women if not then it should ‘prepared’,
‘baked’ and ‘distributed’ having included women. However the practical case is
that the media is still very masculine saving the needs and interests of male against
the notion that development exclusive of women is not development. The
questions should come to our minds as we consume development journalism
products are: who is talking, are women voices present, are women represented,
how are women potrayed.Sadly the answers to all these question are negative hence
gender stereotyping is another major issue
enshrining development journalism. In Zimbabwe stories to do with
economics and politics are always male dominated with dominant voice and the
sources masculine as well as the language and diction which are not gender
friendly. In the Chronicle article about the increment of tollgates, there is
no evidence of women either participating or having affair share for their
voices to be heard. All comments come from a male Dr Obert Mpofu clearly
suggesting that the story is not gender sensitive.
The
legislative system can also cause the disturbance of development journalism.
The government may craft draconian and repressive laws to ensure this
result.Acccording to Thussu 2006:11 “where independent journalism exists in
third world countries, the media’s freedom to critically examine state policies
is severely restricted by the government’s indirect editorial control by
introducing draconian censorship laws or threatening to stop newsprint supply.”
These are mainly applied on the private media that does not necessarily have a
bedfellow relationship with the government. In the Gukurahundi era Zimbabwe saw
the government put into power the emergency powers declaring places like
Tsholotso as no go area to prevent journalists from reporting the atrocities of
the government. Even today the documentation on this era is very little with
most people not knowing what really was happening during that time
It
is with these explanations given above that l rest my case after presenting
some of the factors undermining development journalism. As a result what we see
to be development journalism is not up to standard and lacking. Furthermore
there are other factors that can also lead to the enshrining of development
journalism such as advertising pressure and the digital divide.
No comments:
Post a Comment